Cooperation with the charges’ families as a component of functionality of re-socialization institutions for minors
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Pedagogiki, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i pedagogicznych, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
Submission date: 2016-01-01
Final revision date: 2016-06-30
Acceptance date: 2016-06-30
Publication date: 2016-06-30
Corresponding author
Barbara Jezierska
Instytut Pedagogiki, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i pedagogicznych, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
Wychowanie w Rodzinie 2016;13(1):497-510
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Efficient functioning of a re-socialization institution is a condition of its growth and key factor of appropriate course of the community life that within its structure. Its efficiency relies on explicitly, clearly acknowledged objectives, its internal organization and division of workload as well as the independence of the professional tasks from the personal interests of the staff. Moreover, it tackles the conformity of the staff aspirations with aims and assignments for the accomplishment of which such a structure has been established, entailing high internal integrity, productive cooperation with other facilities and the external environment. It enables the achievement of the projected and socially desired outcomes as well as the accomplishment of common goals upon arrangements of various activities. Cooperation with the family environment of the charges constitutes a key element of the functionality of every re-socialization institution. It must be remembered that parents of the juvenile delinquents manifest features disabling the appropriate course of the upbringing, which consequently can lead to the children’s criminogenic lifestyle. Such features concern structural properties of the families, qualities related to the emotional attitude to their child, parental competences and last but not least – upbringing methods. Non-structural features can be subject to modification in given circumstances. Nonetheless, it is a challenging task particularly when institutions do not participate in the process of family support. Inclusion of the charges’ parents in the process of its correctional activities can condition the quality of educational measures accomplished within, becoming a key indicator of a rational organization and correction of behavior, reforming socially maladjusted behaviors of children and teenagers.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Alexander J.F., Parsons V.B., Short-term behavioral intervention with delinquent families: Impact on family process and recidivism, “Journal of Abnormal Psychology” 1973, № 81(3).
2.
Będkowska-Heine V., Konsultacja rodzinna jako środek stymulujący resocjalizację, [in:] A. Szecówka, B. Koukola, P. Kwiatkowski (eds.), Teoria i praktyka resocjalizacyjna wobec współczesnych zachowań dewiacyjnych w Polsce i Republice Czeskiej, Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe Atla 2, Wrocław 2008.
3.
Brank E., Lane J., Turner S., Fain T., Sehgal A., An Experimental Juvenile Probation Program: Effects on Parent and Peer Relationships, “Crime & Delinquency” 2008, № 54(2).
4.
Brezina T., Adolescent maltreatment and delinquency: The question of intervening processes, “Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency” 1998, № 35.
5.
Bruggen van der C.O., Stams G.J, Bögels S. M., Research review: the relation between child and parent anxiety and parental control: a meta-analytic review, “Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry” 2008, № 49(12).
6.
Cunningham P.B, Henggeler S.W., Brondino M. J., Testing underlying assumptions of the family empowerment perspective, “Journal of Child and Family Studies” 1999, no 8(4), pp. 437–449.
7.
Czapów C., Elementy funkcjonalności instytucji, [in:] A. Podgórecki (ed.), Socjotechnika, funkcjonalność i dysfunkcjonalność instytucji, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1974.
8.
Czapów C., Wychowanie resocjalizujące, Wydawnictwo PWN, Warszawa 1978.
9.
Czapów C., Jedlewski S., Pedagogika resocjalizacyjna, Wydawnictwo PWN, Warszawa 1971.
10.
Dishion T.J., French D.C., Patterson G.R., The development and ecology of antisocial behavior, [in:] D. Cicchetti, D.J. Cohen (eds), Developmental psychopathology, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1995.
11.
Farrington D.P., Family influences on delinquency, “Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency” 2013, № 49(3).
12.
Farrington D.P., Piquero A.R., Jennings W.G., Offending from Childhood to Late Middle Age: Recent Results from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, Springer, New York 2013.
13.
Farrington D.P., Welsh B.C., Saving Children from a Life of Crime: Early Risk Factors and Effective Intervention, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007.
14.
Feldman S., Weinberger D.A., Self Restraint as a Mediator of Family Influences on Boys’ Delinquent Behavior: A Longitudinal Study, “Child Development” 1994, № 65. Henggeler S.W., Melton G.B., Brondino M.J., Scherer D.G., Hanley J.H., Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination, “Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology” 1997, № 65(5).
15.
Huey Jr. S.J., Henggeler S.W., Brondino M.J., Pickrel S.G., Mechanisms of change in multisystemic therapy: reducing delinquent behavior through therapist adherence and improved family and peer functioning, “Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology” 2000, № 68(3).
16.
Howell J.C., Preventing and Reducing Juvenile Delinquency: A Comprehensive Framework, Thousand Oaks Sage Publications, New York 2009.
17.
Jason L.A., Glenwick D.S., Methodological Approaches to Community – Based Research, American Psychological Association, Washington 2012.
18.
Kapalka G. M., Parenting Your Out-of-Control Child: An Effective, Easy-to-Use Program for Teaching Self-Control, New Harbinger Publications, Oakland 2007.
19.
Kurczewski J., Patologia interakcji międzyludzkich, [in:] A. Podgórecki (ed.), Zagadnienia patologii społecznej, Wydawnictwo PWN, Warszawa 1976.
20.
McCord J., Cures that Harm: Unanticipated Outcomes of Crime Prevention Programs, “Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences” 2003, № 587.
21.
Moffitt T.E., Caspi A., Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females, “Development and Psychopathology” 2001, № 13(2).
22.
Patterson G.R., Cicchetti D., Families: Applications of Social Learning to Family Life, Research Press, New York 2005.
23.
Partridge C.R., Gavazzi M., Rhine E.E., Working with the families of serious juvenile offenders: The Growing Up FAST parole program – Contemporary family therapy, Springer, Columbus 2001.
24.
Piquero A.R., Farrington D.P., Blumstein A., Key Issues in Criminal Career Research: New Analyses of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 2007.
25.
Pytka L., Pedagogika resocjalizacyjna, Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej, Warszawa 2008.
26.
Prinzie P., Stams G.J., Deković M, Reijntjes A.H, Belsky J., The relations between parents, Big Five personality factors and parenting: a meta-analytic review, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 2009, № 97(2).
27.
Rothbaum F., Weisz J.R.., Parental caregiving and child externalizing behavior in non- -clinical samples: a meta-analysis, “Psychological Bulletin” 1994, vol. 116, № 1.
28.
Quinn W.H., Psychology Press Family Solutions for Youth at Risk: Applications to Juvenile Delinquency, Truancy, and Behavior Problems, Brunner – Routlege, New York 2004.
29.
Rothbaum F., Rosen K., Ujiie T., Uchida N., Family Systems Theory, Attachment Theory, and Culture, “Family Process” 2002, vol. 41, № 3.
30.
Urban B., Zaburzenia w zachowaniu i przestępczość młodzieży, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2000.
31.
Zimniewicz K., Współczesne koncepcje i metody zarządzania, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne PWE, Warszawa 2009.