Aim: The aim of this study was to show similarities and differences between foster
and biological parents in experiencing parenting difficulties. One of the hypotheses
states that there are differences between biological and foster parents when it comes to
a range of received and given support expected from both family and others.
Methods: In this research an in-depth interview and a questionnaire designed by
the author were used. The tool includes closed questions about parenting knowledge,
skills, and competence in the upbringing and care of their children. Questions also focused
on the resources of parents and outside support. Quality and quantity analysis
was applied to a sense of support received and expected by parents.
Results: The results obtained suggest a difference between biological and foster
parents when it comes to the sense of support coming from outside. Specialists, institutions,
other parents and teachers are more supportive towards foster parents than biological
ones. Partners, family, friends (people close to family) are more supportive towards
biological parents.
Conclusions: There are differences both in terms of received and expected social
and institutional support among biological and foster parents.
REFERENCES(17)
1.
Bass S., Shields M.K., & Behrman R.E., Children, Families, and Foster Care: Analysis and Recommendations, „Children, Families, and Foster Care” 2004, nr 14(1).
Bradley S., Jadda D.A., Brody J., Landy S., Tallet S., Watson W., i in., Brief psychoeducational parenting program: an evaluation and 1-year follow-up, „Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry” 2003, nr 42.
Fisher T., Gibbs I., Sinclair I., & Wilson K., Sharing the care: The qualities sought of social workers by foster carers, „Child & Family Social Work” 2000, nr 5.
Kaminski J., Valle L.A., Filene J.H., & Boyle C.L., A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness, „Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology” 2008, nr 36.
Reid M.J., Webster-Stratton C. & Beauchaine T.P., Parent training in Head Start: A comparison of program response among African American, Asian American, Caucasian, and Hispanic mothers, „Prevention Science” 2001, nr 2.
Rhodes K.W., Orme J.G., & Buehler C., A comparison of family foster parents who quit, consider quitting, and plan to continue fostering, „Social Service Review” 2001, nr 75.
Rodger S., Cummings A., & Leschied A.W., Who is caring for our most vulnerable children?: The motivation to foster in child welfare, „Child Abuse & Neglect” 2006, nr 30.
Piescher K.N., Schmidt M., LaLiberte T., Evidence-Based Practice in Foster Parent Training and Support: Implications for Treatment Foster Care Providers, Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare. University of Minnesota School of Social Work, 2008.
Raport z badania: Rodziny zastępcze niespokrewnione z dzieckiem w województwie kujawsko-pomorskim – stan zastany, Regionalny Ośrodek Polityki Społecznej, Toruń 2012.
Raport z badania: Uwarunkowania rozwoju rodzicielstwa zastępczego w regionie łódzkim, Wydział ds. Pomocy i Integracji Społecznej, Regionalne Centrum Polityki Społecznej w Łodzi, Łodź 2013.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.