Current issue
Online first
Archive
About the Journal
Aims and Scope of the Journal
Publisher and Management organ
Editorial Team
Academic Council
The board of Reviewers
Indexation and impact factors
Copyright and open access policy
Source of funding
Privacy policy
For authors
Procedure for publication
Review procedure
Publication ethics
Publishing fees
Editorial requirements
The upbringing functionality of the family and online risk behaviours of young persons
1
Instytut Pedagogiki, Uniwersytet Wrocławski,
ul. J.W. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
2
Instytut Pedagogiki, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, ul. J.W. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
Submission date: 2018-10-02
Final revision date: 2018-12-06
Acceptance date: 2018-12-06
Publication date: 2018-12-31
Corresponding author
Piotr Kwiatkowski
Instytut Pedagogiki, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, ul. J.W. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
Instytut Pedagogiki, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, ul. J.W. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
Wychowanie w Rodzinie 2018;18(2):379-399
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Aim: The authors have made online risk behaviours of young persons the subject of their analysis. The behaviours pertained to: (1) online dating, (2) staying up all night to be online, (3), online “hating”, and (4) neglecting studying to be online.
Methods: The research sample consisted of 674 students of diverse schools (secondary and vocational schools in the Dolnośląskie voivodship). The average age was 18.43 years. The research was conducted on the basis of the Pearson correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis, and factor regression analysis.
Results: On the basis of the conducted research it has been established that there is a statistically significant correlation between the tendency to engage in risk behaviours online and (1) externalisation problems, (2) sensation seeking, (3) a general tendency to engage in risk behaviour, that is, neurobehavioural disinhibition, as well as (4) the functionality of the family of origin, with a negative correlation with the latter.
Conclusions: Individuals with a high level of neurobehavioral disinhibition from families with high upbringing functionality (which implies a high resilience of the family system as well as a high quality of the purposeful influence on the children – authoritative parenting) display a tendency to take risks online to a level comparable with non-disinhibited individuals, while a low functionality of the family in association with a high level of neurobehavioral disinhibition significantly increases the indicators of risk behaviour online among young persons.
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Aboujaoude E., Problemowe użytkowanie internetu – przegląd literatury, „Postępy Psychiatrii i Neurologii” 2010, nr 19.
2.
Achenbach T.M., Ivanova M.Y., Rescorla L.A., Turner L.V., Althoff R.R., Internalizing/externalizing problems: Review and recommendations for clinical and research applications, „Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry” 2016, nr 55(8).
3.
Baumrind D., Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition, [w:] P.A. Cowan i M. Hetherington (red.), Family transitions, Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1991.
4.
Baumrind D., Current patterns of parental authority, „Developmental Psychology Monographs” 1971, nr 4.
5.
Black K. i Lobo M., A conceptual review of family resilience factors, „Journal of Family Nursing” 2008, nr 14(1).
7.
Castells M., Galaktyka Internetu. Refleksje nad Internetem, biznesem i społeczeństwem, Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, Poznań 2003.
8.
Cloninger C.R., Svrakic D.M., Przybeck T.R.C., A psychobiological model of temperament and character, „Archives of General Psychiatry” 1993, nr 50.
9.
Daitzman R., Zuckerman M., Disinhibitory sensation seeking, personality and gonadal hormones, „Personality and Individual Differences” 1980, nr 1(2).
10.
Garmezy N., Masten A.S., Tellegen A., The study of stress and competence in children: a building block for developmental psychopathology, „Child Development” 1984, nr 55.
11.
Henry C.S., Sheffield Morris A., Harrist A.W., Family resilience: Moving into the third wave, „Family Relations” 2015, nr 64(1).
12.
Horvath P., Zuckerman M., Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behaviour, „Personality and individual differences” 1993, nr 14(1).
13.
Izdebski P., Kotyśko M., Problemowe korzystanie z nowych mediów, [w:] B. Habrat (red.), Zaburzenia uprawiania hazardu i inne tak zwane nałogi behawioralne, Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii, Warszawa 2016.
14.
Jessor R., Risk behavior in adolescence: a psychosocial framework for understanding and action, „Journal of Adolescent Health” 1991, nr 12(8).
15.
Jessor R., Jessor S., Problem behavior and psychological development a longitudinal study of youth, Academic Press, New York 1977.
16.
Jessor R., Van Den Bos J., Vanderryn J., Costa F.M., Turbin M.S., Protective factors in adolescent problem behavior: Moderator effects and developmental change, „Developmental Psychology” 1995, nr 31(6).
17.
Juszczyk S., Człowiek w świecie elektronicznych mediów – szanse i zagrożenia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice 2000.
18.
Kirisci L., Tarter R.E., Reynolds M., Vanyukov M., Individual differences in childhood neurobehavior disinhibition predict decision to desist substance use during adolescence and substance use disorder in young adulthood: A prospective study, „Addictive Behaviors” 2006, nr 31.
19.
Kumpfer K.L., Alvarado R., Family-strengthening approaches for the prevention of youth problem behaviors, „American Psychologist” 2003, nr 58(6–7).
20.
Kumpfer K.L., Alvarado R., Whiteside H.O., Family-based interventions for substance use and misuse prevention, „Substance Use & Misuse” 2003, nr 38(11–13).
21.
Kumpfer K.L., Molgaard V., Spoth R., The Strengthening Families Program for the prevention of delinquency and drug use, „Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency” 1996, nr 3.
22.
Kumpfer K.L., Turner C.W., The social ecology model of adolescent substance abuse: Implications for prevention, „International Journal of the Addiction” 1990–1991, nr 25(4A).
23.
Kwiatkowski P., Rodzinne i temperamnetalne uwarunkowania zachowań problemowych młodzieży, [w:] A. Kamiński i M. Dobijański (red.), Uzależnienia jako wyzwanie dla współczesnego pedagoga resocjalizacyjnego, Ogólnopolskie Stowarzyszenie Pracowników Resocjalizacji i Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Warszawa 2018.
24.
Kwiatkowski P., Resiliencja rodziny jako źródło pozytywnej adaptacji młodzieży, „Wychowanie w Rodzinie”, t. XIII (1/2016).
25.
Kwiatkowski P., Pracownicy w rozwojowych ścieżkach zdrowia. O wypaleniu z perspektywy koncepcji resilience, [w druku].
26.
Masten A.S., Monn A.R., Child and family resilience: A call for integrated science, practice, and professional training, „Family Relations” 2015, nr 64(1).
27.
Olson D., FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study, „Journal of Marital and Family Therapy” 2011, nr 37(1).
28.
Ostaszewski K. (red.), Monitorowanie zachowań ryzykownych, zachowań nałogowych i problemów zdrowia psychicznego 15-letniej młodzieży. Badania mokotowskie 2004–2016. Badania ukraińskie, obwód lwowski 2016, Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii w Warszawie, Warszawa 2017.
29.
Ostaszewski K., Zachowania ryzykowne młodzieży w perspektywie mechanizmów resilience. Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii, Warszawa 2014.
30.
Ostaszewski K., Podstawy teoretyczne profilaktyki zachowań problemowych młodzieży, [w:] M. Deptuła (red.), Diagnostyka, profilaktyka i socjoterapia w teorii i praktyce pedagogicznej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego, Bydgoszcz.
31.
Ostaszewski K., Czynniki ryzyka i czynniki chroniące w zachowaniach ryzykownych dzieci i młodzieży, [w:] Czynniki chroniące młodzież 15-letnią przed podejmowaniem zachowań ryzykownych. Raport z badań HBSC 2006, Instytut Matki i Dziecka, Warszawa 2006.
32.
Pyżalski J., Agresja elektroniczna i cyberbullying jako nowe ryzykowne zachowania młodzieży, Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”, Kraków 2012.
34.
Steinberg L., A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking, „Developmental Review” 2008, nr 28(1).
35.
Steinberg L., Risk taking in adolescence new perspectives from brain and behavioral science, „Current Directions in Psychological Science” 2007, nr 16(2).
36.
Steinberg L., Elmen J.D., Mounts N.S., Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents, „Child Development” 1989, nr 60(6).
37.
Tarter R.E., Kirisci L., Mezzich A., Cornelius J.R., Pajer K., Vanyukov M., Gardner W. Blackson T., Clark D., Neurobehavioral disinhibition in childhood predicts early age at onset of substance use disorder, „American Journal of Psychiatry” 2003, nr 160(6).
38.
Walsh F., Family resilience: A developmental systems framework, „European Journal of Developmental Psychology” 2016, nr 13(3).
39.
Walsh F., Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice, „Family Process” 2003, nr 42(1).
40.
Wawrzak-Chodaczek M., Środki masowego przekazu a społeczne kształtowanie rzeczywistości, [w:] W. Strykowski (red.), Media a edukacja, eMPi2, Poznań 1997.
41.
Zuckerman M., Sensation seeking: A comparative approach to a human trait, „Behavioral and brain sciences” 1984, nr 7(3).
42.
Zuckerman M., P-Impulsive sensation seeking and its behavioral, psychophysiological and biochemical correlates, „Neuropsychobiology” 1993, nr 28.
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
