Self-report measure of cultural capital – content of the CulCap-15 questionnaire Self-report Measure of Cultural Capital – Content of the CulCap-15 Questionnaire and Preliminary Assessment of its Psychometric Properties
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Pedagogy, Faculty of Historical and Pedagogical Sciences, University of Wroclaw,
Wrocław, Poland
Submission date: 2024-12-19
Final revision date: 2025-03-07
Acceptance date: 2025-03-10
Online publication date: 2025-07-25
Corresponding author
Piotr Kwiatkowski
Instytut Pedagogiki, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Dawida 1, 50-525 Wrocław, Polska
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Aim. This article serves to introduce into scientific circulation a new questionnaire for measuring cultural capital, called CulCap-15. The questionnaire diagnoses three interrelated constructs: good manners (kindness, good upbringing), participation in high culture
and orientation to educational success. Methods and materials. The research method was a survey of two samples of adults
(n=1239, n=835) collected using the snowball method. In some analyses, the two samples were combined into one set. The material includes factor analyses to confirm the assumed structure of the tool, an analysis of the questionnaire’s internal reliability, and a path analysis documenting the tool’s associations with dimensions of the family of origin’s educational functionality and level of psychological capital. Results and conclusion. The research confirmed the 3-factor structure of the tool with the pre-postulated dimensions of cultural capital. These are good manners, participation in high culture and a sustained orientation to knowledge acquisition (educational success).
These dimensions are correlated with each other, but their correlations with each other are moderate. For this reason, the recommendation is to consider them as relatively separate in multivariate analyses. The subscales of the questionnaire are factorially homogeneous and have a satisfactory level of internal reliability. Path analyses make it possible to consider the subscales as mediators in the relationship between family factors (parents’ education, the climate of the educational relationship in the family of origin, orientation to the child’s educational success and the child’s participation in high culture) and the level of psychological capital. This result confirms the accuracy of the measurement.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Antonovsky, A. (2005). Rozwikłanie tajemnicy zdrowia: Jak radzić sobie ze stresem i nie zachorować [Unravelling the mystery of health: How to manage stress and avoid getting sick]. Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii.
2.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
3.
Baumrind, D. (2013). Authoritative parenting revisited: History and current status. In R. E. Larzelere, A. Sheffield, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development (pp. 11–34). American Psychological Association.
4.
Bernstein, B. (1980). Socjolingwistyka a społeczne problemy kształcenia [Sociolinguistics and social problems in education]. In M. Głowiński (Ed.), Język i społeczeństwo (pp. 83–119). Czytelnik.
6.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
7.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage.
8.
Breinholt, A., & Jæger, M. M. (2020). How does cultural capital affect educational performance: Signals or skills? British Journal of Sociology, 71(1), 28–46.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4....
10.
Czerepaniak-Walczak, M. (1995). Między dostosowaniem a zmianą: Elementy emancypacyjnej teorii edukacji [Between adaptation and change: Elements of an emancipatory educational theory]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
11.
Czerepaniak-Walczak, M. (2006). Pedagogika emancypacyjna [Emancipatory pedagogy]. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
12.
Davies, S., Rizk, J. (2018). The three generations of cultural capital research: A narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 331–365.
https://doi.org/10.3102/003465....
13.
de Graaf, N., de Graaf, P., & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73(2), 92–111.
https://doi.org/10.2307/267323....
14.
de Graaf, P. M. (1986). The impact of financial and cultural resources on educational attainment in the Netherlands. Sociology of Education, 59(4), 237–246.
https://doi.org/10.2307/211235....
15.
de Moll, F., Grecu, A. L., & Hadjar, A. (2024). Students’ academic habitus and its relation to family capital: A latent class approach to inequalities among secondary school students. Sociological Inquiry, 94(1), 190–220.
https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.1....
16.
DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201.
https://doi.org/10.2307/209496....
17.
DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and martial selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90(6), 1231–1261.
https://doi.org/10.1086/228209.
18.
Dóci, E., Spruyt, B., De Moortel, D., Vanroelen, C., & Hofmans, J. (2023). In search of the social in psychological capital: Integrating psychological capital into a broader capital framework. Review of General Psychology, 27(3), 336–350.
https://doi.org/10.1177/108926....
20.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2006). Stres, kultura i społeczność: Psychologia i filozofia stresu [Stress, culture, and community: Psychology and philosophy of stress]. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
21.
Jæger, M. M., & Møllegaard, S. (2017). Cultural capital, teacher bias, and educational success: New evidence from monozygotic twins. Social Science Research, 65, 130–144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssre....
22.
Kwiatkowski, P., Wylęgły, K., & Jurczyk-Romanowska, E. (2024). Updated version of the Retrospective Family of Origin Parenting Functionality Scale. Wychowanie w Rodzinie, 31(3), 331–371.
https://doi.org/10.61905/wwr/1....
23.
Lamont, M., & Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 153–168.
https://doi.org/10.2307/202113.
24.
Lareau, A., Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32, 567–606.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO....
25.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
26.
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6....
27.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). Learned optimism. Pocket Books.
28.
Snyder, C. R. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures & applications. Academic Press.
30.
Špaček, O. (2017). Measuring cultural capital: Taste and legitimate culture of Czech youth. Sociological Research Online, 22(1), 113–129.
https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.41....
31.
Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Management, 1(2), 165–178.
https://scispace.com/pdf/devel....