Readiness to engage in interpersonal aggression in the interactive perspective of risk and protection
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, ul. J.W. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
 
 
Submission date: 2018-10-02
 
 
Final revision date: 2018-12-06
 
 
Acceptance date: 2018-12-06
 
 
Publication date: 2018-12-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Piotr Kwiatkowski   

Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, ul. J.W. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
 
 
Wychowanie w Rodzinie 2018;18(2):339-360
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Aim: In the theoretical part forms of aggression are named and defined, and the theories explaining the readiness to engage in aggressive behaviour are discussed. An outline of scientific investigation has been provided, with the introduction of the notions of risk factors and protective factors, as well as discussion of two models of the functioning of protective factors (risk compensation and risk reduction). Methods: In the methodological part the research aim is defined as the verification of both the models of protection. Independent variables in risk areas (self-control deficit, externalisation difficulties, the need to seek powerful sensations, and frustration level) and protection (relationship with parents, parental control, and the general assessment of the quality of upbringing in the family of origin), as well as the dependent variable in the form of the index of the behavioural readiness to engage in aggressive behaviour (sum of the indicators of attitude, subjective norm, and aggressive behaviour in the past) are presented. The sample included 229 secondary school students from Opolskie and Slaskie voivodships. Five data analysis techniques have been employed: correlation analysis, factor analysis, analysis of the reliability of the used measurement scales, multiple regression analysis, and factorial regression analysis. Results: Factor analyses have justified the connection of the risk factors and the protection factors into two collective indexes of risk and protection. Regression analyses (multiple and factorial) made it possible to confront both the models (risk compensation and risk reduction) with the data from the sample. The research has not provided a basis for the verification of the correctness of any of the models mentioned above. The risk compensation model has not been confirmed because the protective factors have not presented themselves as predictive in relation to the readiness to engage in behavioural aggression. The risk reduction model has not been confirmed, because the high value of protective factors has not led to a decrease in the readiness to engage in aggression in individuals with a high value of the risk index. The image of the significant interactive relationship was more complex – it has been presented that a high protective index leads to an extremely low willingness to aggression in individuals with a low risk index of aggression and an extremely high willingness to aggression in individuals with a high value of the aggression risk index. Conclusions: High functionality of the family of origin does not exclude propensity for aggression, and in certain circumstances in the form of high intensity of individual aggressive predispositions it may even increase the risk, which can constitute a significant problem from the perspective of prevention and an incentive to seek specific solutions in this matter.
REFERENCES (49)
1.
Agnew R., Building on the foundation of General Strain Theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency, „Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency” 2001, nr 38(4).
 
2.
Ajzen I., The theory of planned behavior, „Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes” 1991, nr 50.
 
3.
Achenbach T.M., Ivanova M.Y., Rescorla L.A., Turner L.V., Althoff R.R. Internalizing/externalizing problems: Review and recommendations for clinical and research applications, „Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry” 2016, nr 55(8).
 
4.
Baumrind D., Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition, [w:] P.A. Cowan i M. Hetherington (red.), Family transitions, Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1991.
 
5.
Baumrind D., Current patterns of parental authority, „Developmental Psychology Monographs” 1971, nr 4.
 
6.
Black K. i Lobo M., A conceptual review of family resilience factors, „Journal of Family Nursing” 2008, nr 14(1).
 
7.
Buker H., Formation of self-control: Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime and beyond, „Aggression and Violent Behavior” 2011, nr 16(3).
 
8.
Cloninger C.R., Svrakic D.M. i Przybeck T.R.C., A psychobiological model of temperament and character, „Archives of General Psychiatry” 1993, nr 50.
 
9.
Crick N.R., Dodge, K.A., A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment, „Psychological Bulletin” 1994, nr 115(1).
 
10.
Czapów C., Wychowanie resocjalizujące, Wydawnictwo PWN, Warszawa 1978.
 
11.
Czapów C., Jedlewski S., Pedagogika resocjalizacyjna, Wydawnictwo PWN, Warszawa 1971.
 
12.
Daitzman R., Zuckerman M., Disinhibitory sensation seeking, personality and gonadal hormones, „Personality and Individual Differences” 1980, nr 1(2).
 
13.
Fishbein M., Ajzen I., Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Addison–Wesley, Reading 1975.
 
14.
Garmezy N., Masten A.S., Tellegen A., The study of stress and competence in children: a building block for developmental psychopathology, „Child Development” 1984, nr 55.
 
15.
Gerrard M., Gibbons F.X., Houlihan A.E., Stock M.L., Pomery E.A., A dual process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. „Developmental Review” 2008, nr 28.
 
16.
Gottfredson M.R., Hirschi T., A general theory of crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1990.
 
17.
Grasmick H.G., Tittle C.R., Bursik R.J., Arneklev B.J., Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime, „Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency” 1993, nr 30(1).
 
18.
Henry C.S., Sheffield Morris A., Harrist A.W., Family resilience: Moving into the third wave, „Family Relations” 2015, nr 64(1).
 
19.
Hirschi T., Causes of delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley 1969.
 
20.
Hoyle R.H., Stephenson M.T., Palmgreen P., Lorch E.P., Donohew R.L., Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking, „Personality and Individual Differences” 2002, nr 32(3).
 
21.
Horvath P., Zuckerman M., Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behaviour, „Personality and individual differences” 1993, nr 14(1).
 
22.
Kirisci L., Tarter R.E., Reynolds M., Vanyukov M., Individual differences in childhood neurobehavior disinhibition predict decision to desist substance use during adolescence and substance use disorder in young adulthood: A prospective study, „Addictive Behaviors” 2006, nr 31.
 
23.
Kumpfer K.L., Alvarado R., Family-strengthening approaches for the prevention of youth problem behaviors, „American Psychologist” 2003, nr 58(6–7).
 
24.
Kumpfer K.L., Alvarado R. i Whiteside H.O., Family-based interventions for substance use and misuse prevention, „Substance Use & Misuse” 2003, nr 38(11–13).
 
25.
Kumpfer K.L., Molgaard V., Spoth R., The Strengthening Families Program for the prevention of delinquency and drug use, „Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency” 1996, nr 3.
 
26.
Kumpfer K.L., Turner C.W., The social ecology model of adolescent substance abuse: Implications for prevention, „International Journal of the Addiction” 1990–1991, nr 25(4A).
 
27.
Kwiatkowski P., Rodzinne i temperamentalne uwarunkowania zachowań problemowych młodzieży, [w:] A. Kamiński i M. Dobijański (red.), Uzależnienia jako wyzwanie dla współczesnego pedagoga resocjalizacyjnego, Ogólnopolskie Stowarzyszenie Pracowników Resocjalizacji i Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Warszawa 2018.
 
28.
Kwiatkowski P., Teoretyczne konteksty profilaktyki niedostosowania społecznego, Oficyna ATUT, Wrocław 2016.
 
29.
Kwiatkowski P., Resiliencja rodziny jako źródło pozytywnej adaptacji młodzieży, „Wychowanie w Rodzinie”, t. XIII (1/2016).
 
30.
Kwiatkowski P., Jurczyk-Romanowska E., Funkcjonalność wychowawcza rodziny a ryzykowna aktywność młodzieży w Internecie, „Wychowanie w Rodzinie”, t. XVIII (2/2018) [w tym tomie].
 
31.
Lemerise E.A., Arsenio W.F., An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing, „Child Development” 2000, nr 71(1).
 
32.
Masten A.S., Monn A.R., Child and family resilience: A call for integrated science, practice, and professional training, „Family Relations” 2015, nr 64(1).
 
33.
Moeller S.B., The metacognitive anger processing (MAP) scale: Preliminary testing, „Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy” 2016, nr 44(4).
 
34.
Olson D., FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study, „Journal of Marital and Family Therapy” 2011, nr 37(1).
 
35.
Ostaszewski, K., Zachowania ryzykowne młodzieży w perspektywie mechanizmów resilience, Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii, Warszawa 2014.
 
36.
Ostaszewski, K., Podstawy teoretyczne profilaktyki zachowań problemowych młodzieży, [w:] M. Deptuła (red.), Diagnostyka, profilaktyka i socjoterapia w teorii i praktyce pedagogicznej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego, Bydgoszcz 2005.
 
37.
Ostaszewski K., Czynniki ryzyka i czynniki chroniące w zachowaniach ryzykownych dzieci i młodzieży, [w:] Czynniki chroniące młodzież 15-letnią przed podejmowaniem zachowań ryzykownych. Raport z badań HBSC 2006, Instytut Matki i Dziecka, Warszawa 2006.
 
38.
Patrick C.J., Fowles D.C., Krueger R.F., Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness, „Development and Psychopathology” 2009, nr 21(3).
 
39.
Pospiszyl K., Psychopatia, Wydawnictwo PWN, Warszawa 1985.
 
40.
Reykowski J., Kochańska G., Szkice z teorii osobowości, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1980.
 
41.
Steinberg L., Risk taking in adolescence new perspectives from brain and behavioral science, „Current Directions in Psychological Science” 2007, nr 16(2).
 
42.
Steinberg L., A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. „Developmental Review” 2008, nr 28(1).
 
43.
Steinberg L., Elmen J.D., Mounts N.S., Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents, „Child Development” 1989, nr 60(6).
 
44.
Tarter R.E., Kirisci L., Mezzich A., Cornelius J.R., Pajer K., Vanyukov M., Gardner W., Blackson T., Clark D., Neurobehavioral disinhibition in childhood predicts early age at onset of substance use disorder, „American Journal of Psychiatry” 2003, nr 160(6).
 
45.
Walsh F., Family resilience: A developmental systems framework, „European Journal of Developmental Psychology” 2016, nr 13(3).
 
46.
Walsh F., Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice, „Family Process” 2003, nr 42(1).
 
47.
Walters G., Criminal belief systems: An integrated-interactive theory of lifestyles. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport 2002.
 
48.
Zuckerman M., Sensation seeking: A comparative approach to a human trait, „Behavioral and brain sciences” 1984, nr 7(3).
 
49.
Zuckerman M., P-Impulsive sensation seeking and its behavioral, psychophysiological and biochemical correlates, „Neuropsychobiology” 1993, nr 28.
 
Accessibility Declaration
 
eISSN:2300-5866
ISSN:2082-9019
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top