The conception of the family in the realm of Lithuanian family policy
 
More details
Hide details
1
Vilnius University, Universiteto str. 3, LTLT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania
 
 
Submission date: 2012-01-01
 
 
Final revision date: 2012-06-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2012-06-30
 
 
Publication date: 2012-06-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Vilija Targamadzé   

Vilnius University, Universiteto str. 3, LTLT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania
 
 
Wychowanie w Rodzinie 2012;5(1):17-31
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The family, its conceptualization and functioning, as well as family policy are discussed at the personal, community and state level. This makes sense because different cultural, historical, ethical, social and other alternations affect the assessment and evaluation of these three significant components. Besides family policy is a very important part of public policy in a state, what makes obvious impact on every human life (even those who are living not in a family). The aim of this article is to shed light on the concept of family, family functioning and family policy as three mutually interacting components in a unified narrative. The object of study is the concept of family, family functioning and family policy from the perspective of its content. The research methods employed include analysis and design of scientific literature and documents. The article analyzes the definition of family, paying particular attention that different authors present various definitions of families. Although these definitions focus on different aspects of families (e.g. marriage, community, the continuity of the nation, etc.), it is shown that in each country the concept of a family is regulated by laws, by which regulations (and other legal documents) are prepared. The legal concept of a family in Lithuania is still not entirely clear. The concept is not defined in the Constitution and marriage is not indicated as an obvious attribute of being a family. Meanwhile, the Family Policy Concept(2008) clearly defines a family, indicating that marriage is necessarily between a man and a woman. The recognition of families only by marriage has raised many discussions among politicians, particular public interest groups and private individuals in Lithuania. These discussions became even stronger when the Constitutional Court stated that the Family Policy Concept 2008) contradicts the Constitution of Lithuania. Having in the mind, that the implementation of family policy in Lithuania is fragmented, lacks a unitary system, including the absence of an official institution responsible for family policy (this function is currently delegated to The Ministry of Social Security and Labour), the implementation of family policy is legislated and implemented without correct procedures. Following the concept of family, family functing and family policy analysis, it can be stated that the concept of family and its functions is different. They are both influenced by different views from scholars’, politicians’ and other particular persons’ or groups’ regarding marriage, as well as socio-cultural, political and other factors. The variety of family conceptions encourages debate, which should not persist and interfere with the formation and implementation of State family policies. The concept of family, family functions and family policies are considered as three mutually interacting components. Based on this, the tools of appropriate and thoughtful family policy implementation can be formulated and developed. Family policy in Lithuania is not yet sufficiently formulated in both conceptual and realizable levels. For that reason it is necessary to do a comprehensive study in order to provide a basis for implementing new family policies based on that study. Likewise, to develop the concept of family and family function, it is necessary to formulate an Educational Policy Concept and to implement its strategies, designing the tools for its implementation in the context.
 
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Bajoriūnas Z., Šeimos edukologija, Vilnius 1997.
 
2.
Bikulčius J., Šeimyninio gyvenimo darna ir jos išsaugojimo paslaptys, Panevėžys 1995.
 
3.
Burvytė S., Ralys K., Ilgūnienė R., Ugdymo šiuolaikinėje šeimoje konceptas, Vilnius 2012.
 
4.
Gaigalienė M., Moksleivių rengimo šeimai socialiniai pedagoginiai parametrai, Vilnius 1998 [niepublikowana praca doktorska].
 
5.
Jovaiša L., Pedagogikos terminai, Kaunas 1993.
 
6.
Juozeliūnienė I., Janas Trostas ir šeimos sociologija: naujos tyrimo galimybės, Vilnius 2003.
 
7.
Juozeliūnienė I., Pabaigos žodis. Pasaulis ir šeima: nacionaliniai šeimos ypatumai, Vilnius 1992.
 
8.
Kanopienė V., Socialinė demografi ja, Vilnius 2008.
 
9.
Karpel M.A., Strauss E.S., Family Evaluation, New York 1983.
 
10.
Kavoliūnaitė-Ragauskienė E., Viešosios šeimos politikos kūrimo ir įgyvendinimo problemos, Lietuvoje, „Teisės problemos”, Vilnius 2012, nr 1(75).
 
11.
Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinis teismas Nutarimas Dėl Lietuvos Respublikos seimo 2008 m. birželio 3 d. nutarimu Nr. x-1569 „Dėl valstybinės šeimos politikos koncepcijos patvirtinimo” patvirtintos valstybinės šeimos politikos koncepcijos nuostatų atitikties Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucijai, Vilnius 2008, http://www.lrkt.lt/Dokumentai2.... html [dostęp: 10.05.2012].
 
12.
Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės nutarimas „Dėl šeimos politikos koncepcijos ir veiksmų krypčių”, Žinios 1996, nr 28–684, Vilnius 1996. Maceina A., Pedagoginiai raštai, Kaunas 1990.
 
13.
Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės nutarimas Lietuvos ūkio (ekonomikos) plėtros iki 2015.
 
14.
LR Konstitucija, Žinios 1992, nr 33–1014, Vilnius 1992.
 
15.
m. ilgalaikė strategija, Vilnius 2002, http://www.ukmin.lt/web/lt/lie... [dostęp: 04.05.2012].
 
16.
Maceina A., Saulės giesmė, Vilnius 1991.
 
17.
Maslauskaitė A., Šeimos politika ES ir Lietuvoje, [w:] A. Davidavičius, E. Platovas (red.), Šeimos politikos ir teisės iššūkiai besiplėčiančioje Europoje (2004–2005), Vilnius 2004.
 
18.
Mikulionienė S., Namų ūkiai ir šeimos Lietuvoje: sociodemografi nis požiūris, [w:] Šeima ir gimstamumas Lietuvoje, Vilnius 1997.
 
19.
Miškinis K., Šeima žmogaus gyvenime, Kaunas 2003.
 
20.
Petzold M., Familienentwicklungspsychologie: Einführung und Überblick, München 1992.
 
21.
Purvaneckienė G., Lietuvos gyventojų nuomonė apie vyro ir moters vaidmenis visuomenėje, [w:] Lietuvos šeima, Vilnius 1995.
 
22.
Stankūnienė V., Jonkarytė A., Mikulionienė S., Mitrikas A.A., Maslauskaitė A., Šeimos revoliucija? Iššūkiai šeimos politikai, Vilnius 2003.
 
23.
Uzdila J., Dorinis asmenybės ugdymas šeimoje, Vilnius 1993.
 
24.
Vaitkevičius J., Socialinės pedagogikos pagrindai, Vilnius 1997.
 
25.
Valstybinė šeimos politikos koncepcija, Vilnius 2008, h ttp://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter/w5_ show?p_r=5477&p_k=1 [dostęp: 12.05.2012].
 
eISSN:2300-5866
ISSN:2082-9019
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top