Outdoor education in the post-pandemic era – experience and needs of animators-practitioners in working with children and young persons on the example of Polish NGOs
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych, Instytut Pedagogiki, Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
Submission date: 2023-06-10
Final revision date: 2023-08-29
Acceptance date: 2023-08-29
Publication date: 2023-11-10
Corresponding author
Agnieszka Janik
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych, Instytut
Pedagogiki, Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
Wychowanie w Rodzinie 2023;30(1):147-171
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction. The starting point for the considerations undertaken in the article were the experiences of children and young persons in Poland related to the post-pandemic reality, such as social isolation, reduced engagement in social activities, and less time spent outdoors. In this context, outdoor education seems to be a valuable phenomenon, as confirmed by the growing interest of educators, animators, and teachers. In the first part of the paper, the author presents a definition framework for terms related to outdoor education that are
important for further consideration, placing them in the context of counteracting the effects of a pandemic. Aim. The aim of the article is to present the results of the author’s own research on the recognition of experiences, opportunities, and needs in the implementation of outdoor education in non-governmental organizations from the perspective of animators-practitioners. The main research problem was as follows: What are the possibilities and needs in the implementation of outdoor education from the perspective of the examined animators? Methods. The research was qualitative in nature, and interpretative theories constituted the research paradigm (Denzin, Lincoln, 2005). The research method consisted of semi-structured qualitative research interviews conducted based on a prepared interview guide. The research group consisted of five animators (two men and three women) working for medium-sized non-governmental organizations in Poland. The respondents were chosen carefully, considering the particulars of the workplace and previous experiences with outdoor learning. The analysis was formal and qualitative. Results. The results of the research showed the in-depth and complex experiences of animators-practitioners in the field of outdoor education. The study also revealed animators’ needs and possibilities regarding the implementation of this education when working with children and young persons in a non-formal environment. The outdoor education model emerging from the research showed a rich experience supported by reflection on the specificity of the activities carried out, especially in the context of working in nature, the importance of individual experiences, creating situations that enable building independence and experiencing risk, and building interpersonal relationships in a group. The article was written as part of a research project coordinated by the Association of Critical Education [Stowarzyszanie Edukacji Krytycznej] in Poland as part of the “Fundusz
Pomocowy dla Organizacji Pozarządowych oraz Inicjatyw Obywatelskich 2022-2023” Program. It was financed by the Polish-American Freedom Foundation and implemented by the Education for Democracy Foundation.
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Allison, P., Seaman, J. (2017). Experiential education. W: M. A. Peters (red.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (ss. 1-6). Singapore: Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_449-1.
2.
Andrzejewska, J. (2020). Edukacja outdoorowa szansą na budowanie relacji rówieśniczych [Outdoor education as an opportunity for building peer relations]. Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny 39(2), 151-167.
3.
Bąk, A., Leśny, A., Palamer-Kabacińska, E. (red.) (2014). Przygoda w edukacji i edukacja w przygodzie: outdoor i adventure education w Polsce [Adventure in education and education in adventure: Outdoor and adventure education in Poland]. Warszawa: Fundacja Pracownia Nauki i Przygody.
4.
Brinkmann S., Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing third edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
5.
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. W: N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (red.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (ss. 1–32). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
6.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: The Macmillan company.
7.
Dewey, J. (1963). Demokracja i wychowanie: Wstęp do filozofii wychowania. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.
8.
Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey K., Morris M., Young Choi M., Sanders D., Benefield P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. The School Science Review, 87(320), 107-111.
9.
D’Isanto, T., D’Elia, F. (2021). Primary school physical education in outdoor during COVID-19 pandemic: The perceptions of teachers. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 16(3proc), 1521-S1535. DOI: 10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc3.67.
10.
Friedman, S., Gibson, J., Jones, C., Hughes, C. (2022). ‘A new adventure’: A case study of autistic children at Forest School. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-17. DOI: 10.1080/14729679.2022.2115522.
11.
Gibbs, G. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data. Los Angeles - London: SAGE Publications.
12.
Gilbertson, K., Bates, T., McLaughlin, T., Ewert, A. (2006). Outdoor education: Methods and strategies. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14.
Grant-Vest, S., Wragg, R. (2021). World Youth Skills Day. Impact of COVID-19 on children and young people’s education, wellbeing, and life opportunities: What do the Public Think? Iposos. Pobrane 05.12.2023 z:
https://www.ipsos.com/en/world....
15.
Hart, R. A. (1997). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. New York - London: UNICEF; Earthscan.
16.
Jagodzińska, M., Strumińska-Doktór, A. (2019). Outdoor education wzmocnieniem realizacji zrównoważonego rozwoju [Outdoor education to strengthen the implementation of sustainable development]. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, 17(4), 55–67. DOI: 10.21697/seb.2019.17.4.06.
17.
Janik, A. (2015). Współczesne ujęcia zabawy dzieci: W stronę naturalnych przestrzeni zabaw [Contemporary representations of children’s play: Towards natural play spaces]. W: J. Malinowska, E. Jezierska-Wiejak (red.), Dziecko w sytuacjach uczenia się [The child in learning situations] (ss. 209-224). Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Atut - Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe.
19.
Kida, P., Dudek, M. (red.) (2016). Przewodnik po Edukacji Przygodą w Polsce [Guide to adventure education in Poland]. Warszawa: Fundacja Pracownia Nauki i Przygody.
20.
Klus-Stańska, D. (2002). Konstruowanie wiedzy w szkole [Constructing knowledge at school]. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.
21.
Leśny, A. (2023). Outdoor education w edukacji osób dorosłych [Outdoor education in adult education]. W: B. Habrych, (red.), Edukacja w świecie zmian: Wybór tekstów opublikowanych na platformie EPALE: 2022 [Education in a world of change: A selection of texts published on the EPALE platform: 2022]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo FRSE.
22.
Louv, R. (2010). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. London: Atlantic Books.
23.
Łubkowska, W., Paczyńska-Jędrycka, M., Jońca, M. (2014). „Outdoor Education” w procesie kształtowania pozytywnych postaw społecznych młodzieży wykluczonej [“Outdoor Education” in the process of shaping positive social attitudes of excluded young people]. W: M. Kowalski, A. Knocińska, P. Frąckowiak (red.), Resocjalizacja – Edukacja – Polityka społeczna. Współczesne konteksty teorii i praktyki resocjalizacyjnej [Resocialisation – Education – Social Policy. Contemporary contexts of rehabilitation theory and practice] (ss. 171-182). Środa Wielkopolska: Wydawnictwo Wielkopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Społeczno-Ekonomicznej.
24.
Mannion, G., Ramjan, C., McNicol, S., Sowerby, M., Lambert, P. (2023). Teaching, learning and play in the outdoors: A survey of provision in 2022. NatureScot Research Report 1313. Pobrane 05.12.2023 z:
https://www.nature.scot/doc/na....
25.
Michalak, R., Parczewska, T. (2019). (Nie)obecność outdoor education w kształceniu szkolnym [The (im)presence of outdoor education in school education]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
26.
Michalak, R., Parczewska, T. (2022). Outdoor education: Perspective of Polish primary school teachers. Studia z Teorii Wychowania, 2(39), 83-101. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.9261.
27.
Michl, W. (2011). Pedagogika przeżyć [Experiential pedagogy]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
28.
Miles, J., Priest, S. (red.) (1990). Adventure Education. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
29.
Moore, R. C. (2014). National guidelines: Nature play & learning places: Creating and managing places where children engage with nature. Raleigh, NC - Reston, VA: Natural Learning Initiative; National Wildlife Federation.
30.
Munro, S. A. (2022). Learning in local greenspace – an evaluation report. NatureScot Research Report No.1296. Pobrane 06.12.2023 z:
https://www.nature.scot/doc/na....
31.
Palamer-Kabacińska, E., Leśny, A. (red.) (2012). Edukacja przygodą: outdoor i adventure education w Polsce: Teoria, przykłady, konteksty [Adventure Education: Outdoor and Adventure Education in Poland: Theory, examples, contexts]. Warszawa: Fundacja Pracownia Nauki i Przygody.
32.
Palmer, J. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century: Theory, practice, progress and promise. London, New York: Routledge.
33.
Paluch, M. (2022). Pedagogika lasu i pierwsze ścieżki jej teoretycznych konceptualizacji [Forest pedagogy and the first paths of its theoretical conceptualisations]. Forum Pedagogiczne, 12(2), 17-30.
34.
Parsons, A. (2011). Young children and nature: Outdoor play and development, experiences fostering environmental consciousness, and the implications on playground design. Master of landscape architecture. Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
35.
Ryszka, R. (2016). Pedagogika przeżyć Praktycznie: O innej metodzie pracy grupowej [Experiential pedagogy Practically: On the other method of group working]. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”.
36.
Silberman, M. L. (red.) (2007). The handbook of experiential learning. San Francisco : Pfeiffer.
37.
Silverman, D. (red.) (2004). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
38.
Spiteri, J. (2020). Assessing the usefulness of outdoor learning in the early years during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malta. Malta Review of Educational Research, 14(2), 141-161.
39.
Vella-Brodrick, D. A., Gilowska, K. (2022). Effects of nature (greenspace) on cognitive functioning in school children and adolescents: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1217-1254. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-022-09658-5.
40.
Waite, S. (2011). Teaching and learning outside the classroom: Personal values, alternative pedagogies, and standards. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 39(1), 65-82. DOI: 10.1080/03004270903206141.
41.
Warzywoda-Kruszyńska, W., Kruszyński, K. (2022). „Katastrofa pokoleniowa” – skutki pandemii COVID-19 dla dzieci [“Generational disaster” - the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children]. W: A. Kacprzak, M. Gońda, I. Kudlińska-Chróścicka (red.), Problemy społeczne: Trwałość i zmienność w dynamicznej rzeczywistości: Księga jubileuszowa z okazji 45-lecia pracy naukowej i dydaktycznej profesor Jolanty Grotowskiej-Leder [Social issues: Persistence and variability in a dynamic reality: Anniversary book on the occasion of the 45th anniversary of the scientific and teaching work of Professor Jolanta Grotowska-Leder] (ss. 161-174). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
42.
Wilson, R. (2012). Nature and young children: Encouraging creative play and learning in natural environments. London, New York: Routledge.