Family in the context of resocialization pedagogy
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Education, Institute of Education and Social Studies, Palacky University in Olomouc, Žižkovo nám. 5, Olomouc, Czech Republic
 
2
Faculty of Education, Department of Social Pathology and Sociology, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
 
 
Submission date: 2016-09-29
 
 
Final revision date: 2016-12-12
 
 
Acceptance date: 2016-12-12
 
 
Publication date: 2017-09-29
 
 
Corresponding author
Tereza Raszková   

Faculty of Education, Institute of Education and Social Studies, Palacky University in Olomouc, Žižkovo nám. 5, Olomouc, Czech Republic
 
 
Stanislava Hoferková   

Faculty of Education, Department of Social Pathology and Sociology, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
 
 
Wychowanie w Rodzinie 2017;16(2):67-74
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The family as a socializing factor stands in the centre of interest of many disciplines, including social and re-social pedagogy. It is one of the most important external factors within the etiology of social deviance; dysfunctional family environment is usually one of the main causes of behavioural disorders. Inter-generational crime, abuse of addictive substances by family members, neglect and abuse, unemployment and social exclusion often appear in the anamnesis of delinquent individuals; educational problems occur in childhood. The family is also an important and often neglected factor in the re-socialization and re-integration of delinquent individuals. It plays a crucial role in the “remedy” and resocialization of individuals in all types of etopedical care facilities – in children's homes with schools, youth detention institutes, educational care centres or in prison (criminal measures), as well as in the treatment by a curator (social curator or curator for children and juveniles), or a probation and mediation officer (probation program, probation supervision). In detention facilities within the penitentiary practice contact with the family is a part of rehabilitation programs, so-called treatment programs. Support of the relationship with the family is also one of the fundamental rights of the convict. In the penitentiary process the family is one of the biggest motivating factors; it may be helpful in the implementing of treatment programs and it helps to maintain the good mental health of convicts. But the family may also represent a negative factor, e.g. in a case of the introduction of illegal goods into prisons or in the case of further negative and undesirable effects on the individual (e.g. inter-generational crime).
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Bělík, V., Hoferková, S., Raszková, T., Family in the Context of Penitentiary Work (Rodina v kontextu penitenciaristiky), [in:] M. Jůzl, Social Pedagogy in Penitentiary Work (Sociální pedagogika v penitenciární praxi), Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Brno 2014.
 
2.
Czapów C., Jedlewski S., Resocialization Pedagogy (Resocializační pedagogika), SPN, Prague 1981.
 
3.
Hradečná M., Selected Problems of Social Pedagogy (Vybrané problémy sociální pedagogiky), Karolinum, Prague 1995.
 
4.
Konopczyński M., Metody twórczej resocjalizacji, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2009.
 
5.
Kraus B., Basics of Social Pedagogy (Základy sociální pedagogiky), Portál, Prague 2014.
 
6.
Mařádek V., Penitentiary (Vězeňství), University of Ostrava in Ostrava, Faculty of Education, Ostrava 2005.
 
7.
Miovský M. et al., Explanatory Dictionary of Basic Terms of School Risk Behaviour Prevention (Výkladový slovník základních pojmů školské prevence rizikového chování), Department of Addictology, 1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University in Prague and Prague General Teaching Hospital, publishing Togga, Prague 2012.
 
8.
Moravcová I., Resocialization Pedagogy Concept and the Foundation of Its Study in The Czech Republic (Pojetí resocializační pedagogiky, základy studia oboru v České republice), “Socialia 2010 Social Deviance in the Context of Social Sciences” (“Sociální deviace v kontextu společenských věd”), Gaudeamus, Hradec Králové 2010.
 
9.
Ondrejkovič P., The Theory of Socialization in Social Work (Teórie socializácie v sociálnej práci), “Socialia 2004”, Gaudeamus, Hradec Králové 2005.
 
10.
Průcha J., Veteška J., Andragogic Dictionary (Andragogický slovník), Grada, Prague 2012.
 
11.
Raszková T., Hoferková S., Education and reeducation of prisoners permanently unfit for work assignment in Czech prisons (Edukace a reedukace trvale pracovně nezařaditelných v českých věznicích), Gaudeamus, Hradec Králové 2015.
 
12.
Sekera J., The Community System of Rehabilitation Facilities for Adolescents, I: “Staff Interpersonal Relationships at Rehabilitation Facilities for Adolescents” (Komunitní systém v resocializačních zařízeních pro adolescenty, I: “Mezilidské vztahy personálu v resocializačních zařízeních pro adolescenty”), University of Ostarva in Ostrava, Faculty of Education, Ostrava 2008.
 
13.
Stankowski A., Ethopedia: Introduction to Resocialization Pedagogy Etopedie: úvod do resocializační pedagogiky, University of Ostrava in Ostrava, Faculty of Education Ostrava 2003.
 
14.
Veteška J., Mediation and Probation in the Context of Social Andragogy (Mediace a probace v kontextu sociální andragogiky), Wolters Kluwer, Praha 2015.
 
15.
Vojtová V., Chapters from Ethopedia I: Approaches to Emotional and Behaviour Disorders (Kapitoly z etopedie I: Přístupy k poruchám emocí a chování v současnosti), Masaryk University, Brno 2008.
 
Accessibility Declaration
 
eISSN:2300-5866
ISSN:2082-9019
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top