Selected Dispositional Correlates of Teachers’ Job Satisfaction
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Pedagogy, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
 
2
Faculty of Social Sciences, Academy of Applied Sciences – College of Management and Administration in Opole, Opole, Poland
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-09-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-12-08
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-12-10
 
 
Corresponding author
Ewa Kowalska   

Instytut Pedagogiki, Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Licealna 9, 65-417 Zielona Góra, Polska
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Aim. The aim of the research was to find out the relationship between teachers’ job satisfaction and personality traits. The teaching profession belongs to the group of professions that serve other people in a special way. It involves numerous stressors that determine the quality and effectiveness of work. Personality traits may make it easier or more difficult to cope with the difficulties of the teacher’s profession and thus favour or prevent the teacher from achieving job satisfaction. Methods and materials. Two research tools were used in the research: the Life Satisfaction Scale and the HEXACO-PI-R personality questionnaire. The research was conducted on a random sample of teachers of different ages and with various years of experience. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis to identify significant relationships between variables. Results and conclusion. The study showed a significant, positive relationship between the job satisfaction of the surveyed teachers and the level of their extroversion and conscientiousness. Therefore, it can be assumed that the surveyed teachers who achieve high results in terms of the traits of extroversion and conscientiousness are more satisfied with their work than other teachers. The remaining variables tested with the HEXACO-100 questionnaire, i.e., honesty-humility, emotionality, agreeableness and openness to experience, did not correlate with the variable job satisfaction. Moreover, it was demonstrated that there are statistically significant differences in the level of extroversion of teachers of different ages. There were no statistically significant differences between teachers with different levels of professional advancement in terms of the level of conscientiousness.
REFERENCES (49)
1.
Arvey, R. D., Bouchard, T. J., Segal, N. L., & Abraham, L. M. (1989). Job satisfaction: Environmental and genetic components. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 187–192.
 
2.
Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2020). Objections to the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure — and why those objections fail. European Journal of Personality, 34(4), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.22....
 
3.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
 
4.
Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J., & Wang, Q. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between job satisfaction and subjective well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 915–934.
 
5.
Bruk-Lee, V., Khoury, H. A., Nixon, A. E., Goh, A., & Spector, P. E. (2009). Replicating and Extending Past Personality/Job Satisfaction Meta-Analyses. Human Performance, 22,156–189.
 
6.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.
 
7.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
 
8.
Ferreira, Y. (2020). Arbeitszufriedenheit: Grundlagen, anwendungsfelder, relevanz [Job satisfaction: Fundamentals, fields of application, relevance]. Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
 
9.
Fischer, L., & Fischer, O. (2005). Arbeitszufriedenheit: Neue stärken und alte risiken eines zentralen konzepts der organisationspsychologie [Job satisfaction: New strengths and old risks of a central concept in organisational psychology]. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 7, 5–20.
 
10.
Griffin, R. W. (1988). Consequences of quality circles in an industrial setting: A longitudinal assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 338–358.
 
11.
Hall, C. S., Lindzey, G., & Campbell, J. B. (2006). Teorie osobowości [Theories of personality]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
12.
Jakimiuk, B. (2018). Wybrane czynniki kształtujące satysfakcję z pracy nauczyciela [Selected factors shaping teacher job satisfaction]. Ruch Pedagogiczny, 2, 73–79.
 
13.
Jasiński, A. M., & Derbis, R. (2019). Środowiskowe i osobowościowe uwarunkowania satysfakcji z pracy [Environmental and personality factors determining job satisfaction]. Problemy Higieny i Epidemiologii, 100(1), 10–17.
 
14.
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits – selfesteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.
 
15.
Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.
 
16.
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior,19, 151–188.
 
17.
Judge, T. A., Parker, S., Colbert, A., Heller, D., & Illies, R. (2001). Job satisfaction: A crosscultural review. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & Ch. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Job satisfaction: A cross-cultural review handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 25–52). SAGE Publications.
 
18.
Kang, W., & Malvaso, A. (2023). Associations between personality traits and areas of job satisfaction: Pay, work itself, security, and hours worked. Behavioral. Sciences, 13, 445.
 
19.
Korczyński, S. (2016). Poziom satysfakcji nauczycieli z pracy edukacyjnej [The level of teachers satisfaction with their educational work]. Prace Naukowe Akademii im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie. Rocznik Polsko-Ukraiński, 18, 219–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.16926/rpu....
 
20.
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personality Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.
 
21.
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25(5), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319....
 
22.
Levin, I., & Stokes, J. P. (1989). Dispositional approach to job satisfaction: Role of negative affectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 752–758.
 
23.
Liberska, H. (2011). Teorie rozwoju człowieka [Theories of human development]. In J. Trempała (Ed.). Psychologia rozwoju człowieka: Podręcznik akademicki (pp. 71–126). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
24.
Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational behavior and human performance, 4, 309–336.
 
25.
Maslow, A. (2006). Motywacja i osobowość [Motivation and personality]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
26.
Neuberger, O., & Allerbeck, M. (1978). Messung und analyse von arbeitszufriedenheit: Erfahrungen mit dem Arbeitsbeschreibungsbogen (ABB) [Measuring and analysing job satisfaction: Experiences with the job description form (ABB)]. Verlag Hans Huber.
 
27.
Oleś, P. K. (2012). Psychologia człowieka dorosłego [Psychology of the adult]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
28.
Oleś, P. K. (2018). Wprowadzenie do psychologii osobowości [An introduction to personality psychology]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
 
29.
Organ, D. W., & Lingl, A. (1995). Personality, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 339–350.
 
30.
Poraj, G. (2014). Profile psychologiczne nauczycieli a ich funkcjonowanie w roli zawodowej [Teachers’ psychological profiles and their functioning in their professional role]. Psychologia Wychowawcza, 5, 131–145.
 
31.
Rosenstiel, L., Molt, W., & Rüttinger, B. (2005). Organisationspsychologie [Organisational psychology].Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
 
32.
Saltukoğlu, G., Tatar, A., & Özdemir, H. (2019). The HEXACO personality measure as a predictor of job performance and job satisfaction. Psychological Applications and Trends, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.36315/2019i....
 
33.
Schneider, B., & Dachler, H. P. (1978). A note on the stability of the Job Descriptive Index. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 650–653.
 
34.
Sęk, H. (Ed.). (2004). Wypalenie zawodowe: Przyczyny i zapobieganie [Burnout: Causes and prevention]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
35.
Skimina, E., Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Szarota, P., & Izdebski, P. K. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Polish versions of the HEXACO-60 and the HEXACO-100 personality inventories. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/.10.5114/cipp....
 
36.
Smak, M., & Walczak, D. (2015). Pozycja społeczno-zawodowa nauczycieli: Raport z badania jakościowego [The social and professional status of teachers: Report on qualitative research]. Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
 
37.
Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E., & Clausen, J. A. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 56–77.
 
38.
Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1985). Stability in the midst of change: A dispositional approach to job attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 469–480.
 
39.
Strelau, J., & Doliński, D. (2008). Psychologia T. 1–2 [Psychology Vol. 1–2]. GWP.
 
40.
Strojna, A. (2015). System motywacji jako kluczowy czynnik kształtowania kapitału ludzkiego [The incentive system as a key factor in shaping human capital]. In A. Rogozińska-Pawełczyk (Ed.), Gospodarowanie kapitałem ludzkim: Wyzwania organizacyjne i prawne (pp. 117–128). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
 
41.
Sun, J., Kaufman, S. B., & Smillie, L. D. (2018). Unique associations between Big Five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well-being. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 158–172. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12301.
 
42.
Śliwa, S. (2021). Kompetencje krytyczne polskich i czeskich pedagogów w świetle badań porównawczych [Critical competences of Polish and Czech educators in the light of comparative research]. Wydawnictwo Sindruk.
 
43.
Tatar, A., Saltuküğlu G., Ozdemir, H., & Bekiroğlu, B. (2019). Six-Factor Model of Personality (HEXACO) domains as predictors of job performance and job satisfaction. İş te Davranış Dergisi, 4(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.25203/idd.6....
 
44.
Warr, P. (2007). Work, happiness, and unhappiness. Lawrence Erlbaum.
 
45.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAs Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
 
46.
Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 173–194.
 
47.
Zalewska, A. (2001). Reactivity and job satisfaction at a new workplace. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 32, 3, 167–174.
 
48.
Zalewska, A. (2003). „Skala Satysfakcji z Pracy” – pomiar poznawczego aspektu ogólnego zadowolenia z pracy: Zadowolenie z pracy i jego komponenty [“Job Satisfaction Scale” – measuring the cognitive aspect of overall job satisfaction: Job satisfaction and its components]. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Psychologica, 7, 49–61.
 
49.
Zdun, G., Kopański, Z., Brukwicka, I., & Jastrjemska, S. (2016). Zadowolenie z pracy [Job satisfaction]. Journal of Clinical Healthcare, 4, 16–21. ttp://jchc.eu/numery/2016_4/201644.pdf.
 
Accessibility Declaration
 
eISSN:2300-5866
ISSN:2082-9019
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top