Aim. The aim of the analyses carried out was to test the structure of the new, extended version of the tool to measure the educational functionality of the generational family. The modification of the tool consisted of the addition of two new subscales measuring the promotion of educational success and cultural participation in the generational family to the version developed previously. Methods and materials. The research was conducted on a sample of 1, 270 individuals aged 18–37 years. Exploratory and confirmational factor analysis was used to assess the structure of the tool. Independently of the above, factorial regression analysis was used to verify the association of the questionnaire subscales with the ability to adapt positively (resilience-trait). Results and conclusion. In light of the research, three subscales were extracted. The first is the positive climate of the parenting relationship in the family (combining the aspect of authoritative parenting and the resilience of the family system). Two additional subscales extracted in the analyses were the parents’ orientation towards the child’s educational success and towards promoting the child’s participation in high culture. The above structure was revealed in exploratory factor analysis and was verified in confirmatory factor analysis. Factorial regression analyses established the presence of significant interaction effects between individual subscales of the tool and the level of trait resilience. Combinations of high scores on individual subscales led to the highest rates of positive adaptability in the subjects.
REFERENCES(73)
1.
Andersen, I. G., Jæger, M. M. (2015). Cultural capital in context: Heterogeneous returns to cultural capital across schooling environments. Social Science Research, 50, 177–188.
Bakiera, L. (2019). Wychowanie i rodzicielstwo, styl wychowania i styl rodzicielski: Analiza terminologiczna [Upbringing and parenting, style of upbringing and parenting style: Terminological analysis]. Psychologia Wychowawcza, 16, 60–72.
Baumrind, D. (2013). Authoritative parenting revisited: History and current status. In: R. E. Larzelere, A. Sheffield, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development (pp. 11–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Baumrind, D. (1991a). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In: J. Brooks-Gunn, R. M. Lerner, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), The Encyclopaedia on adolescence (pp. 746–758). New York: Garland Publishing.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
de Tchorzewski, A. M. (2018). Wstęp do teorii wychowania [Introduction to educational theory]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Ignatianum w Krakowie.
DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grade of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201.
Duncan, L. G., Coatsworth, J. D., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). A model of mindful parenting: Implications for parent–child relationships and prevention research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 12(3), 255–270.
Gurycka, A. (2008). Błędy w wychowaniu [Mistakes in parenting]. In: E. Kubiak-Szymborska, D. Zając (Eds.), O wychowaniu i jego antynomiach (pp. 324–340). Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo WERS.
Hawley, D. R., DeHaan, L. (1996). Toward a definition of family resilience: Integrating life-span and family perspectives. Family Process, 35(3), 283–298.
Hobfoll S. E. (2006). Stres, kultura i społeczność: Psychologia i filozofia stresu [Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and philosophy of stress]. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Jæger, M. M., Møllegaard, S. (2017). Cultural capital, teacher bias, and educational success: New evidence from monozygotic twins. Social Science Research, 65, 130–144.
Kumpfer, K. L., Molgaard, V., & Spoth, R. (1996). The strengthening families program for the prevention of delinquency and drug use. In: R. de V. Peters, R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency (vol. 3, pp. 241–267). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
Kwiatkowski, P. (2016a). Resiliencja rodziny jako źródło pozytywnej adaptacji młodzieży [Family resilience as a source of positive adaptation among young people]. Wychowanie w Rodzinie, 13(1), 311–344.
Kwiatkowski, P. (2016b). Teoretyczne konteksty profilaktyki niedostosowania społecznego [Theoretical contexts for the prevention of social maladjustment]. Wrocław: Oficyna ATUT.
Kwiatkowski, P. (2018). Gotowość do agresji interpersonalnej w interakcyjnej perspektywie ryzyka i protekcji [Readiness to engage in interpersonal aggression in the interactive perspective of risk and protection]. Wychowanie w Rodzinie, 28(2), 339–360.
Kwiatkowski, P. (2019b). Wypalenie uczniowskie – erozja pozytywnych stanów mentalnych w toku pełnienia roli ucznia i jej wybrane uwarunkowania [Student burnout – the erosion of positive mental states in the course of the student role and its selected determinants]. In: Z. B. Gaś (Ed.), Profilaktyka zachowań ryzykownych w teorii i praktyce (pp. 125–144). Lublin: Innovatio Press Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomii i Innowacji w Lublinie.
Kwiatkowski, P. , Jurczyk-Romanowska, E. (2022). A retrospective measure of the quality of family upbringing – a proposition of a new tool. Wychowanie w Rodzinie, 28(3), 13–28.
Lerner, R. E., & Grolnick, W. S. (2020). Maternal involvement and children’s academic motivation and achievement: The roles of maternal autonomy support and children’s affect. Motivation and Emotion, 44(3), 373–388.
Maccoby, E. E., Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In: P. H. Mussen, E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development (vol. 4, pp. 1–101) New York: Wiley.
McCubbin, M., McCubbin, H. (1996). Resiliency in families: A conceptual model of family adjustment and adaptation in response to stress and crisis. In: H. McCubbin, A. Thompson, & M. McCubbin (Eds.), Family assessment: Resiliency, coping.
Mikiewicz, P. (2016). Socjologia edukacji: Teorie, koncepcje, pojęcia [Sociology of education: Theories, concepts, and terms]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA.
Molgaard, V. K., Spoth, R. L., & Redmond, C. (2000). Competency training – the strengthening families program: for parents and youth 10–14 [Juvenile Justice Bulletin]. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Muszyńska, E. (1998). Swoboda, przymus i przemoc w relacjach dziecko-dorosły [Freedom, coercion, and violence in child-adult relationships]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Okulicz-Kozaryn, K. (2015). Skuteczność polskiej adaptacji Strengthening Families Program (SFP 10–14) [Effectiveness of Polish adaption of the Strengthening Families Program (SFP 10-14)]. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 20(1), 1, 78–100. DOI: 10.14656/PFP20150106,.
Olson, D. H., Gorall, D. M. (2003). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In: F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (pp. 514–547). New York: Guilford.
Ostaszewski, K. (2014). Zachowania ryzykowne młodzieży w perspektywie mechanizmów resilience [Youth risk behaviour in the perspective of resilience mechanisms]. Warszawa: Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii.
Parent, J., Garai, E., Forehand, R., Roland, E., Potts, J., Haker, K.,& Compas, B. E. (2010). Parent mindfulness and child outcome: The roles of parent depressive symptoms and parenting. Mindfulness, 1, 254–264.
Parent, J., McKee, L. G., Rough, J. N., & Forehand, R. (2016). The association of parent mindfulness with parenting and youth psychopathology across three developmental stages. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(1), 191–202. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-015-9978-x.
Roth, R. M., Isquith, P. K., & Gioia, G. A. (2014). Assessment of executive functioning using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). In: S. Goldstein, J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of executive functioning (pp. 301–331). Springer Science: Business Media.
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E., L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.
Steinberg, L. (1990). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across varied ecological niches. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1(1), 19–36.
Steinberg, L., Darling, N. E., & Fletcher, A. C. (1995). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment: An ecological journey. In: P. Moen, G. H. Elder, Jr., & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 423–466). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Steinberg, L., Elmen, J. D., & Mounts, N. S. (1989). Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents. Child Development, 60, 1424–1436.
Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Darling, N., Mounts, N. S., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Over time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 65(3), 754–770.
Surzykiewicz, J., Konaszewski, K., & Wagnild, G. (2019). Polish version of the resilience scale (RS-14): A validity and reliability study in three samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2762.
Wagnild, G. (2009). The Resilience Scale user’s guide for the US English version of the Resilience Scale and the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14). Worden, MT: Resilience Center.
Williams, K. L., Wahler, R. G. (2010). Are mindful parents more authoritative and less authoritarian? An analysis of clinic-referred mothers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(2), 230–235.
Xu, J., Hampden-Thompson, G. (2012). Cultural reproduction, cultural mobility, cultural resources, or trivial effect? A comparative approach to cultural capital and educational performance. Comparative Education Review, 56, 98–124.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.