The challenges of transmitting family values in multi-cultural contexts
More details
Hide details
University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506, Stany Zjednoczone
Submission date: 2014-07-01
Final revision date: 2014-08-14
Acceptance date: 2014-08-14
Publication date: 2014-08-14
Corresponding author
Patricia Hyjer Dyk   

University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506, Stany Zjednoczone
Wychowanie w Rodzinie 2014;9(1):149-158
Across time and cultures, the institution of the family remains resilient. Although the family is but one component of a complex social system, it remains the setting in which a child’s first social development occurs. Yet the family is situated in a sociocultural environment with numerous socialization agents complementing and vying for influence as to the values that the next generation of citizens should adopt. This conceptual paper will articulate competing elements within the social system that contend for the socialization role. Ongoing scholarly inquiry will need to gauge the relative importance of these factors for supporting or challenging the parents’ transmittal of their family values to the next generation. To aid in this endeavour, a systems model provides a lens that can be employed by scholars to understand family processes in multi-cultural contexts and is useful in historical analyses of the transmission of family values.
Alwin D., Cohort replacement and changes inparental socialization values, “Journal of Marriage and Family” 1990, Vol. 52 (2).
Bojar H., Rodzina i życie rodzinne (Family and family life), [in:] In M. Marody (ed.), Spoleczeństwo polskie u progu zmiany systemowej, “ANEKS”, London 1991.
Bronfenbrenner U., Toward an experimental ecology of human development,“American Psychologist” 1977, Vol. 32(7).
Fux B., Which models of the family are encouraged or discouraged by different family policies? [in:] F. Kaufmann, A. Kuijsten, H. Schulze, K. Strohmeier (red.), Family life and family policies in Europe Volume 2: Problems and issues in comparative perspective, Oxford Press, London 2002.
Goode W., The theoretical importance of the family, [in:] A. Skolnick, J. Skolnick (ed.), Family in transition (17th Edition), Pearson Education, Inc. 2014.
Harwood R., Miller, J., Irizarry N., Culture and attachment: Perceptions of the child in context, Guilford Press, New York 1995.
Hofstede G., Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA 1980.
Kaiser Family Foundation, Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8 to 18 year olds, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA 2010.
Kagitcibasi C., Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side, Erlbaum. Mahwah, New Jersey 1996.
Lee G., Socialization, [in:] M. Sussman, E. Steinmetz (ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family, Plenum, New York 1987.
Možný I., Katrňák T. The Czech family, [in:] B. Adams, J. Trost (red.), Handbook of world families, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California 2005.
Oyserman D., Coon H., Kemmelmeier M., Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses, “Psychological Bulletin” 2002, Vol. 128, № 1.
Roberts K., Clark S., Fagan C., Tholen J., Surviving post-communism: Young people in the former Soviet Union, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK 2000.
Tamis-LeMonda C., Way N., Hughes D., Yoshikawa H., Kalman R., Niwa, E., Parent’s goals for children: The dynamic coexistence of individualism and collectivism in cultures and individuals, [in:] M. Killen, R. Coplan (ed.), Social development in childhood and adolescence: A contemporary reader, Wiley Blackwell, New Jersey 2011.
Titkow A., Duch D., The Polish family: Always an institution, [in:] M. Robila (ed.), Families in Eastern Europe, Elsevier, Boston 2004.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top