Modernity, education young generation in the prospect of historical-pedagogical research
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Zakład Historii Oświaty, Katedra Historii Wychowania i Pedeutologii, Wydział Nauk o Wychowaniu, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Pomorska 46/48, 91-408 Łódź, Polska
 
 
Publication date: 2019-12-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Aneta Bołdyrew   

Zakład Historii Oświaty, Katedra Historii Wychowania i Pedeutologii, Wydział Nauk o Wychowaniu, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Pomorska 46/48, 91-408 Łódź, Polska
 
 
Wychowanie w Rodzinie 2019;21(2):65-79
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Aim. The aim of the article is to present in an aggregate way, the most important, especially significant for transformation of family life, youths and children’s educational situation, in the social transition in conditions of the modernity in the 19th and in the beginning of the 20th centuries. Methods. The methods of the historical-pedagogical research applied to analysis of the historical and historiographical sources were used. Results. The result of the analysis shows the function of the education in context of social modernisation. Questions are set regarding the defi nition of the conceptualisation of childhood, adolescence, and “the perfect family.” The changes in approach to the young generation resultant from the “sacralisation” of the childhood and the childhood’s transnational scientisation are presented. The article demonstrate how it infl uenced the evolution of the children’s situation in the middle-class family in the second half of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century
REFERENCES (39)
1.
Adas, M. (1989). Machines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance. Ithaca – London: Cornell University Press.
 
2.
Byford, A. (2020). Science of the Child in Late Imperial and Early Soviet Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198825050.001.0001.
 
3.
Byford, A. (2017). The Imperfect Child in Early Twentieth-Century Russia. History of Education, 5, 595-617. DOI: 10.1080/0046760X.2017.1332248.
 
4.
Cahan, E.D. (2006). Toward a Socially Relevant Science: Notes on the History of Child Development Research. W: B. Beatty, E.D. Cahan, J. Grant (red.), When Science Encounters the Child: Education, Parenting, and Child Welfare in 20th-Century America. New York: Teachers College Press.
 
5.
Cherkasov, A.A., Smigel, M. (2016). Public Education in the Russian Empire during the Last Third of the XIX Century: Parish Schools. European Journal of Contemporary Education 4.
 
6.
Draus J., Terlecki R. (2010). Historia wychowania: T. 2, wiek XIX i XX. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM, WSFP „Ignatianum”.
 
7.
Dudek P. (2002). Geschichte der Jugend. W: H.H. Krüger, C. Grunert (red.), Handbuch Kindheits- und Jugendforschung. Opladen: Leske+Budrich. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-97551-5_14.
 
8.
France, A. (2007). Understanding Youth in Late Modernity, New York: Open University Press.
 
9.
Frost, G.S. (2009). Victorian Childhoods. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group. DOI: 10.5040/9798216032007.
 
10.
Frykman, J., Löfgren O. (2007). Narodziny człowieka kulturalnego: Studium z antropologii historycznej szwedzkiej klasy średniej. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki.
 
11.
Giddens, A. (2012). Socjologia. Warszawa: PWN.
 
12.
Gloger, M. (2007). Pozytywizm: Między nowoczesnością a modernizmem. Pamiętnik Literacki, 1, 5-19.
 
13.
Gofron, B. (2008). Funkcjonalizm i teoria konfliktu wobec idei równości w edukacji. Podstawy Edukacji, 1.
 
14.
Grone, C. (2007). Schulen der Nation?: Nationale Bildung und Erziehung an höheren Schulen des Deutschen Kaiserreichs von 1871 bis 1914. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld.
 
15.
Henebry, C. (2014). Child as Other: The Crisis of Representing Childhood. Theses and Dissertations, 1.
 
16.
Herf, J. (1986). Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511583988.
 
17.
Illick, J.E. (2002). American Childhoods. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI: 10.9783/9780812202328.
 
18.
Jäger, G. (1988). Der Kampf gegen Schmutz und Schund: Die Reaktion der Gebildeten auf die Unterhaltungsindustire. Archiv für Geschichte des Buchwesens, 31.
 
19.
Jedlicki, J. (2000). Świat zwyrodniały: Lęki i wyroki krytyków nowoczesności. Warszawa: „Sic!”.
 
20.
Jones, K.W. (2002). Taming the Troublesome Child American Families, Child Guidance, and the Limits of Psychiatric Authority. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv21hrgv2.
 
21.
Jordan, T.E. (1987). Victorian Childhood: Themes and Variations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
 
22.
Kizwalter, T. (2007). Historia powszechna: Wiek XIX. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Trio.
 
23.
Kizwalter, T., Polska nowoczesność: Genealogia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. DOI: 10.31338/uw.9788323546344.
 
24.
Kolle, H. (2006). Social Change in Nineteenth-Century Russia: Family Development in a Proto-Industrial Community. Bergen: University of Bergen.
 
25.
Koselleck, R. (2012). O antropologicznej i semantycznej strukturze edukacji. W: R. Koselleck, Semantyka historyczna. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
 
26.
Lassonde, S. (2013). Age, Schooling, and Development. W: P. Fass (red.), The Routledge History of Childhood in the Western World. London – New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203075715.
 
27.
Mikiewicz, P. (2016). Socjologia edukacji: Teorie, koncepcje, pojęcia. Warszawa: PWN.
 
28.
Mintz, S. (2004). Huck’s Raft: A History of American Childhood. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
 
29.
Nutbrown, C., Clough, P. (2014). Early Childhood Education: History, Philosophy and Experience. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446288863.
 
30.
Oelkers, J. (1999). Die Geschichte der Pädagogik und ihre Probleme. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 4. DOI: 10.25656/01:5959.
 
31.
Perrot, M., Martin-Fugier, A. (1997). Rytuały życia prywatnego burżuazji. W: M. Perrot (red.), Historia życia prywatnego: T. 4, Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
 
32.
Schütze, Y. (2000). Konstanz und Wandel: Zur Geschichte der Familie im 20. Jahrhundert. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 42.
 
33.
Smuts, A.B. (2006). Science in the Service of Children 1893–1935, New Haven – London: Yale University Press. DOI: 10.12987/yale/9780300108972.001.0001.
 
34.
Soppelsa, P.S. (2009). The Fragility of Modernity: Infrastructure and Everyday Life in Paris, 1870–1914. [Ann Arbor]: University of Michigan.
 
35.
Steedman, C. (2003). Bodies, Figures and Physiology: Margaret McMillan and the Late Nineteenth-Century Remaking of Working-Class Childhood. W: R. Cooter (red.), In the Name of the Child: Health and Welfare 1880–1940. London: Routledge.
 
36.
Turmel, A. (2008). A Historical Sociology of Childhood: Developmental Thinking, Categorization and Graphic Visualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511489099.
 
37.
Volo, J.M., Volo, D.D. (2007). Family Life in 19th-Century America. Westport: Greenwood Press.
 
38.
Zelizer, V.A. (1985). Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. New York: Basic Books.
 
39.
Zhao, G., The Modern Construction of Childhood: What Does It Do to the Paradox of Modernity?. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30, 241-256. DOI: 10.1007/s11217-010-9213-8.
 
Accessibility Declaration
 
eISSN:2300-5866
ISSN:2082-9019
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top