Measurement of Perception of Family of Origin: Polish Adaptation of the General Family Functioning Scale
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Historical and Pedagogical Sciences, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland
 
2
Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Historical and Pedagogical Sciences, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-06-10
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-09-22
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-12-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Ryszard Poprawa   

Instytut Psychologii, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Polska
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction. The McMaster Model of Family Functioning (Epstein et al., 1978) is one of the most widely used systemic models describing family functioning. It identifies three primary family tasks and evaluates functioning across six dimensions. Based on this model, the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD) was developed to allow individuals to assess their family of origin. Aim. This article aims to present the adaptation and validation process of the Polish version of the General Family Functioning Scale (GFFS), a subscale of the FAD. The GFFS can be used independently to measure perceived satisfaction or distress related to family functioning. Methods and materials. The adaptation procedure included team translation and backtranslation, assessment of test–retest reliability, and evaluation of equivalence between the original and Polish versions. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to verify the scale’s structure. Criterion validity was tested using tools assessing family problems, attachment style, internalising and externalising symptoms, parental alcohol-related issues, psychological distress, and basic psychological needs satisfaction or frustration. Results. CFA confirmed a good fit with the one-factor model. The Polish version demonstrated satisfactory reliability and equivalence to the original. Criterion validity analyses showed positive correlations with indicators of family dysfunction. Conclusion. The Polish version of the GFFS is a valid and reliable screening tool for assessing perceived dysfunction in the family of origin.
REFERENCES (39)
1.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. N. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
 
2.
Becker-Pestka, D., Dubis, M., & Różyńska, S. (2018). Rodzina dysfunkcyjna i patologiczna w przestrzeni życiowej młodych dorastających [Dysfunctional and pathological families in the developmental context of adolescents]. Wydawnictwo Exante.
 
3.
Bedyńska, S., & Książek, M. (2012). Statystyczny drogowskaz 3: Praktyczne przewodnik wykorzystania modeli regresji oraz równań strukturalnych [Statistical guidepost 3: Practical applications of regression and structural equation models]. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Sedno spółka z o.o., Szkoła Wyższa Psychologii Społecznej.
 
4.
Boterhoven De Haan, K. L., Hafekost, J., Lawrence, D., Sawyer, M. G., & Zubrick, S. R. (2015). Reliability and validity of a short version of the General Functioning Subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Family Process, 54(1), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.1....
 
5.
Boullier, M., & Blair, M. (2018). Adverse childhood experiences. Paediatrics and Child Health, 28(3), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paed....
 
6.
Bowlby, J. (1979). The Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 637–638. https://doi:10.1017/S0140525X0....
 
7.
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationship (pp. 46–76). The Guilford Press.
 
8.
Byles, J., Byrne, C., Boyle, M. H., & Offord, D. R. (1988). Ontario child health study: Reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Family Process, 27(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545....
 
9.
Bylund, A., Arestedt, K., Benzein, E., Thorell, A., & Persson, C. (2016). Assessment of family functioning: Evaluation of the General Functioning Scale in a Swedish Bariatric Sample. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 30(3), 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12....
 
10.
Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., & Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031....
 
11.
Chłopkiewicz, M. (1987). Osobowość dzieci i młodzieży: Rozwój i patologia [Personality of children and adolescents: Development and psychopathology]. Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.
 
12.
Cudak, H. (2011). Dysfunkcje rodziny i jej zagrożenia opiekuńczo-wychowawcze [Family Dysfunction and risks in the care and upbringing of children]. Pedagogika Rodziny, 1(2), 7–14.
 
13.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327....
 
14.
Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752....
 
15.
Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Levin, S. (1978). The McMaster model of family functioning. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 4(4), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752....
 
16.
Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D., Ryan, C., Miller, I., & Keitner, G. I. (1993). The McMaster Model: View of healthy family functioning. In F. Walsh (Eds.), Normal family processes (2 ed., pp. 138–160). The Guilford Press.
 
17.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
 
18.
Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). A users’s guide to the general health questionnaire. NFER-NELSOn Publishing Co. Ltd.
 
19.
Gomez, R., Stavropoulos, V., Zarate, D., & Palikara, O. (2021). Symptom Checklist-90-Revised: A structural examination in relation to family functioning. PLOS ONE, 16(3), artykuł 0247902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
20.
Grzegorzewska, I. (2016). Rodzinne uwarunkowania problemów i zaburzeń psychicznych u dzieci i młodzieży [Family factors in the development of mental health problems among children and adolescents]. In T. Rongińska (Ed.), Człowiek w całokształcie życia rodzina – edukacja – praca (pp. 87–95). Psychologiczne Zeszyty Naukowe, 2. Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
 
21.
Grzegorzewska, I., & Cierpiałkowska, L. (2016). Dzieci alkoholików w perspektywie rozwojowej i klinicznej [Children of alcoholics: A developmental and clinical perspective]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
 
22.
Hamilton, E., & Carr, A. (2016). Systematic review of self-report family assessment measures. Family Process, 55, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.1....
 
23.
Hodgins, D. C., Matica-Tyndale, E., El-Guebaly, N., & West, M. (1993). The CAST-6: Development of a short-form of the children of alcoholics screening test. Addictive Behaviors,18, 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4....
 
24.
Hornowska, E. (2009). Testy psychologiczne: Teoria i praktyka [Psychological tests: Theory and practice]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe ,,Scholar”.
 
25.
Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., Hardcastle, K. A., Sethi, D., Butchart, A., Mikton, C., & Dunne, M. P. (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2(8), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-....
 
26.
Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.20....
 
27.
Makowska, Z., & Merecz, D. (2001). Polska adaptacja Kwestionariuszy Ogólnego Stanu Zdrowia Davida Goldberga: GHQ-12 i GHQ-28 [The Polish adaptation of David Goldberg’s General Health Questionnaires: GHQ-12 and GHQ-28]. In D. Goldberg & P. Williams, Ocena zdrowia psychicznego na podstawie badań kwestionariuszami Davida Goldberga: Podręcznik dla użytkowników kwestionariuszy GHQ-12 i GHQ-28 (D. Merecz-Kot, Trans., pp. 191–264). Instytut Medycyny Pracy. (Original work published 1988).
 
28.
Marchwicki, P. (2004). Style przywiązania a postawy rodzicielskie: Doniesienie z badań. [Attachment styles and parenting attitudes: Evidence from a study]. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 7(2), 81–103.
 
29.
Margasiński, A. (2015). Teoria i wybrane modele systemów rodzinnych [Theory and selected models of family systems]. In A. Margasiński (Ed.), Rodzina w ujęciu systemowym: Teoria i badania [The family from a systems perspective: Theory and research] (pp. 6–29). Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.
 
30.
McLaughlin, K. A., DeCross, S. N., Jovanovic, T., & Tottenham, N. (2019). Mechanisms linking childhood adversity with psychopathology: Learning as an intervention target. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 118, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat....
 
31.
Miller, I. W., Ryan, C. E., Keitner, G. I., Bishop, D. S., & Epstein, N. B. (2000). The Mc-Master approach to families: Theory, assessment, treatment, and research. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6....
 
32.
Plopa, M. (2004). Psychologia rodziny: Teoria i badania [Family psychology: Theory and research]. Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls. Impuls Publishing House.
 
33.
Poprawa, R. (2017). Skala Ryzykownych Zachowań i Stanów: Pomiar eksternalizacji i internalizacji problemów i zaburzeń: Wstępne opracowanie psychometryczne [Risky Behaviours and States Scale: Measuring externalizing and internalizing problems and disorders: Preliminary psychometric evaluation; Unpublished manuscript].
 
34.
Poprawa, R., & Rams, J. (2022). Skala Spostrzegania Problemów w Rodzinie Pochodzenia – konstrukcja i walidacja narzędzia: Wstępne opracowanie [Perceived problems in the family of origin scale: Construction and validation of the instrument: Preliminary report; Unpublished manuscript].
 
35.
Roostin, E. (2018). Family influence on the development of children. Primary Edu: Journal of Primary Education, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22460/pej.v....
 
36.
Ryan, C. E., Epstein, N. B., & Keitner, G. I. (2005). Evaluating and treating families: The McMaster approach. Taylor & FranGroup.
 
37.
Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.9....
 
38.
Tabiś, K., Poprawa, R., Barański, M., & Dworzańska, J. (2021). The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale: Adaptation and associations with wellbeing and mental health disorders in a Polish sample. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 9(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2....
 
39.
Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00323....
 
Accessibility Declaration
 
eISSN:2300-5866
ISSN:2082-9019
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top